Home | FEATURES | Suzuki vs. Consumers Union – Another Chapter in the Samurai Saga

Suzuki vs. Consumers Union – Another Chapter in the Samurai Saga

Suzuki vs. Consumers Union

Another Chapter in the Samurai Saga

-Eric Bewley

BREA, CA  -Suzuki Motor Corporation today (June 25, 2002)announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals in California has issued an important ruling in favor of the company in its product-disparagement lawsuit against Consumers Union (“CU”) and its magazine, Consumer Reports. Reversing an earlier ruling by a federal district court in Santa Ana, California, the Court of Appeals held that Suzuki had presented enough evidence to warrant a jury trial on its charges that CU, for financial motives, published knowing falsehoods when it claimed, in 1988 and several times since, that CU’s tests had shown the Suzuki Samurai “easily rolls over in turns” and was therefore “Not Acceptable.”

In its decision, the Court of Appeals concluded that the district court “did not give adequate credit to . . . evidence of test-rigging” presented by Suzuki, and that “[a] reasonable jury could find by clear and convincing evidence that CU sought to produce a predetermined result in the Samurai test.” Among other things, the court relied upon a statement by CU’s editorial director, after CU’s test drivers had failed to make the Samurai roll over, that “If you can’t find someone to roll  his car, I will.” The Court also emphasized that, at the time CU initially criticized the Samurai, CU had just purchased a new building and therefore “needed to boost its revenues to complete its capital campaign.” The court further concluded that this “evidence of financial motive dovetails with the evidence of test rigging.” Based on this and other evidence, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s earlier ruling against Suzuki, and sent the case back for a jury trial.

According to Suzuki’s managing counsel, George Ball, “today’s ruling means that CU will now have to answer in court for the false charges it has spread and continues to spread regarding the Suzuki Samurai sport-utility vehicle. We look forward to presenting our evidence and moving the case toward final resolution.”

Suzuki’s lawsuit asserts claims for product disparagement based on statements by CU since April 1994. Those statements repeated CU’s earlier allegations, dating to 1988, that the Suzuki Samurai is “Not Acceptable” because, according to CU, it is “likely to roll over during a maneuver that could be demanded of any car at any time.” Suzuki further alleges that these statements created substantial harm, not only to sales of the Samurai, but also to sales of other Suzuki automobiles. The court’s ruling will allow Suzuki to seek damages for its lost sales of Samurais and other vehicles to the extent it can prove that those losses were caused by disparaging statements made by CU after April 1994. 


suzuki_underline_650.GIF (1221 bytes) 

Check Also

Trail Tough’s new Trail Savage Gear Set

COTTAGE GROVE, MN - We're extremely excited to tell you about Trail Tough's new offering for Suzuki Sidekick, Geo Trackers, and Grand Vitara. What is exciting is not only that Brent and his fine crew in Medford have bridged the gap between the stock gear set and the 4.24:1 low gear set that may be too low for many applications. They have solved one of the fundamental issues that has plagued Suzuki enthusiasts since we started wheeling the Grand Vitara and Xl-7 or at least, began transplanting those engines and transmissions into Samurai and Sidekicks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.